Sunday, January 25, 2009

“The Lord of The Ring” review

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghdBfZqSvTo&feature=PlayList&p=0CBD80C62088779C&index=0

The adventure film , "the Fellowship of The Ring" , is the first part of "The Lord of The Ring" , which produced by New Line Cinema. At the beginning of the movie, it told us the legend of the lord of the ring: once upon a time, the excellent artisans made three rings for spirits, seven rings for little women, and nine rings for human beings by dark lord Sauron. In addition, Sauron made a super power ring which named the lord of ring for himself in the back. This ring can make the holder without dead and hide in bad situation. The most terrible thing was that the lord of ring had the super power which could control the other nineteen rings and had the whole world power. It helped Sauron control the whole world in the dark. The people under the control resisted Sauron because of his high pressure, so spirits, human beings and the other living things together fought against the Sauron armies. Finally, they defeated the Sauron armies. But the war wasn't over and Sauron wasn't dead because the lord of ring wasn't destroyed. This gave spirits, human beings and the other living things another mission which they would find the lord ring and destroy it.

This film's batter sense is very attractive to audience because of specific technique of three D, and remarkably effective at creating a horrific "you-are-there" feel. I think the main idea expresses that the evil can't not instead of the Justice.

3 comments:

  1. I will comment on this later, but I want you to write a review about a short movie (i.e., between 3 minutes and 30 minutes). Why? First, you can't write a decent review of a movie that's close to three hours long in such a short review. Second, I want the people who read this to be able to see the movie so that they can tell if it's a good review.


    For a couple examples, see
    Wendy’s Movie Review:
    微笑的魚 A Fish with A Smile
    http://monkey4cec2see.blogspot.com/2009/01/wendys-movie-review-fish-with-smile.html

    OR

    Ying Ying’s Movie Review
    http://monkey4cec2see.blogspot.com/2009/01/ying-yings-movie-review.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. CONTENTS:-
    i think you choice a good film but you started to spoil it . i think you missed the main idea of review (your opinion).

    COHESIVENESS:-
    Generally the review needs some arrangements .
    in the third pragraphe "it told us the legend of the lord of the ring" what is "US" refer to?

    GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY:-
    "This film's batter sense is very attractive to audience", I understand you want to say " This film has a good sense so it's attractive to audience".
    in conculsion pragraphe "specific technique of three D", that is missunderstanding so you should write "specific technique in three dimentions"

    ReplyDelete
  3. CONTENT
    Don't tell everything like me.

    COHESIVENESS
    Who is Sauron? Is he or she the excellent artisans or someone?

    GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY
    Should write "without death" instead of "without dead".

    ReplyDelete